Few good learning points on value investing (Bruce Greenwald)

By -


Q&A: Bruce Greenwald, Professor & Investing Expert
'Value is in cheap, obscure and disappointing stocks'
Jitendra Kumar Gupta / Mumbai April 26, 2011, 0:49 IST


Bruce GreenwaldBruce Greenwald is a professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Business and Director of Research at FirstEagle Funds. Called ‘a guru to Wall Street’s gurus’, he is a recognised authority on value investing. Edited excerpts from an interview with Jitendra Kumar Gupta:
Many people focus on the revenue statement or earnings. How important is the balance sheet and what does one look for as a value investor? 
The balance sheet is more important than the income statement for value investors, since it provides more reliable valuation information, that does not depend on projecting the future. The exception to this rule is the case of franchise businesses, where long-run earnings depend on competitive advantages, not just assets.

As a value investor what is the starting point before selecting a stock?

The starting point for a value search strategy is ugly (nuclear today), obscure (small caps in Indonesia) and disappointing (Japan, not China or India) stocks that are cheap. Both statistical history and behavioural finance results indicate these stocks will significantly outperform stocks as a whole. The measures to use in screening for these stocks are low market-to-book, low PE (based on several years of lagged earnings), low price-to-cash flow, low sales growth and/or a declining price over at least two years.
What are the basic criteria a value investor will look for before exiting or selling a stock?
Value investors will normally begin selling when a stock gets within 10 per cent of their estimate of intrinsic value and will be completely out when it is 10 per cent above that price.
Warren Buffett says he is 15 per cent (Philip) Fisher and 85 per cent (Benjamin) Graham. As an individual investor, how would one mix the approaches of value and growth investing? Can a pure value approach work?
The critical judgment that has to be made is whether or not the company at issue enjoys the protection of barriers-to-entry/competitive advantages/franchise positions (they are all different ways of referring to the same basic situation). If it does not, then sooner or later entry and competition will drive returns to a level that just justifies the firm’s asset investments.
Thus, asset values supplemented by current earnings power values will be the best measure of what the stock is worth. Also, in these cases, entry and competition will eliminate the value of any market growth, so you do not have to and should not worry about growth rates/opportunities.
For franchise businesses, the value of earnings will be far in excess of asset values and growth matters. Because growth makes it difficult to assign a particular value to firms, you need in these cases to calculate the returns these firms are likely to yield (including growth benefits) on their market values, assuming no improvement in current earnings multiples. If such a return is 12-15 per cent compared to a “market return” of seven-eight per cent, then you have an adequate return-based margin of safety for these ‘Fisher’ stocks. The main point is that good value investors approach the valuation of Fisher/franchise opportunities completely differently from how they approach Graham/non-franchise stocks.











Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Market Euphoria: Too Happy for Too Long

By -
Image
T he  other day, I was talking to a friend who asked me about the direction of markets and what could happen post-Budget. Not that I was interested in predicting specific levels, I said, "if people are too happy for too long, that itself is the biggest risk." As it goes on, keeping people happy for too long, can turn into a national disaster, much like other disasters where ultimately the government is blamed.                                                    The Dangers of Overconfidence Among the investing legends, I have lot of liking for Howard Marks and his insights about human behaviour, market cycles and many other things like second order thinking and going against the crowd.  In his recent memo he writes (Mo st interesting lines in my view), The adage "success is a dangerous neighbour" is particularly relevant in investing. When individuals achieve financial success, they often attribute it to superior skill and knowledge. This overconfi dence can lead to
Read more

Knowledge Compounding: Why it is better to be foolish at the start than at the finish

By -
Image
  W e are probably at the fourth stage of the market where being in the quality stocks is curse, they are no longer producing returns because they are fully discovered. Investors are now bidding for low quality, unloved, undiscovered stocks. This marks the phase of the market where investors begin to compromise on quality and the fundamental principles of investing in favor of chasing the next big stock.     They start disregarding quality in pursuit of higher returns. This herd mentality leads to a strong bullish phase in low-quality stocks. Novice investors, or so-called alpha-riders, become the new authorities in the market.   This reminds me about the wisdom that Vijay Kedia shared with us few years back, “In good times everything looks rosy particularly for the first-time investors who have not seen the market cycles and hence beat the drums. Bull markets produce many self-claimed genius or stock pickers but in reality, the real stock market genius are bornin the bear
Read more

Knowledge Compounding: Wow! I found my next multi-bagger stock.

By -
Image
R eading about a company, I was thrilled to discover its immense potential for growth. The business boasted a strategic position, a vast pool of opportunity, a reputable promoter, significant capital injection, and a doubling of production capacity – all the makings of a winner. Wow! I found my next multi-bagger.                                               But hold on! Examining the share price and valuation quickly deflated my enthusiasm. Isn't this a common occurrence these days? There's an overemphasis on the "top-down" approach, with little regard for the actual price.   This relentless pursuit of the next big idea, sector, or company has eroded the valuable investing principles we learned from Benjamin Graham and Warren Buffett.   It's a growth frenzy, but where's the margin of safety? Everything is validated in the name of growth and the current political and economic climate, as if there's no possibility of things going wrong.   Howev
Read more